At this year’s Visier Outsmart (our annual user conference), we were fortunate to have two notable industry thought leaders take part: Tom Davenport, Big Data luminary and pioneer of the concept of “competing on analytics,” and Dr. John Sullivan, internationally renowned HR thought leader (and guest writer on the Visier blog).
The underlying theme tying their two presentations together was that in order for HR to be successful with analytics, it’s necessary to connect HR goals (or your people strategy) to organizational goals (the business strategy). It brought to mind what Dave Ulrich — the author of modern HR and a past Visier Outsmart speaker — and his team wrote in their paper The New HR Competencies: Business Partnering from the Outside-In:
“High-performing HR professionals think and act from the outside-in. They are deeply knowledgeable of and able to translate external business trends into internal decisions and actions. They understand the general business conditions (e.g., social, technological, economic, political, environmental, and demographic trends) that affect their industry and geography. They target and serve key customers of their organization by identifying customer segments, knowing customer expectations, and aligning organizational actions to meet customer needs.”
Below are some highlights from the presentations.
The Four Eras of Analytics in Workforce and Elsewhere: From Artisanal Analytics to Augmented Automation — Tom Davenport
In his keynote, Davenport explained that there are four eras of analytics, each one progressing in the complexity of the data being analyzed and the range of insights that can be derived as a result of innovations that occur in each.
Rather than thinking of each era as a period of time, with a defined start and end date, the eras are open-ended stages, where businesses and functions can enter and leave as their need to make sense of their data increases and becomes more complex. The eras are:
Analytics 1.0: Artisanal Analytics
This is also what we think of as traditional analytics, where descriptive analytics and reporting are the norm. Analytics use here is focused on internal decision support and any predictive models are based mainly on human hypotheses. Business users may be starting to use analytics, but it’s primarily the domain of analysts.
Analytics 2.0: Big Data Analytics
This era is characterized by large, complex, and unstructured data that requires new computational capabilities to sort through it all. Data scientists and data products are introduced as a result; however, not every business is taking advantage of these.
Recommended Read: Why Great HR Strategy Shouldn’t Be About Making HR Better
Analytics 3.0: Data Economy Analytics
In this era, analytics is core to the business. Data and analytics-based products are utilized to make decisions at scale. For example, employee location data and employee communications and network data can be mined for insights such as attrition risk, organizational design and effectiveness, and fraud and malfeasance detection.
Analytics 4.0: Cognitive Analytics
Analytics is used to make automated decisions in this era. Cognitive technologies, such as machine learning, enable faster and more accurate decision-making, and also the replacement of certain knowledge work tasks with automation.
According to Davenport, HR had a later start on analytics than other business functions and most of HR is in the first era of our analytics journey. In the Analytics 1.0 stage, HR is integrating and curating their workforce data from various transactional systems, as well as developing the business acumen to tell a story with the data that will lead to better and more productive business decisions.
For those looking ahead to Analytics 4.0, Davenport stressed that while many knowledge work job tasks will be automated, immense productivity gains from this could fund the retraining and redeployment of people. HR should be prepared in the future for a workforce augmented by technology rather than replaced by it — HR will need to play a leading role in enabling their organization’s success with it.
The Critical Role of Data In Talent Acquisition — Dr. John Sullivan
According to Dr. Sullivan, Human Capital is the #1 global business challenge facing CEOs for the fourth year in a row. This is because few CEOs are confident in the quality of their Human Capital metrics. Often what is shared with the C-Suite is what Sullivan calls the “So What” metrics, which elicit a “Why Should I Care?” reaction from executives. To capture the C-Suite’s attention, Talent Acquisition needs to become more businesslike and begin to calculate all standard business analytics. The more Talent Acquisition professionals are measuring what matters to CEOs, the more value they can provide to the business.
Sullivan illustrated this with an anecdote about a referral program at a retailer that was cut in order to save each retail store a few thousand dollars. The cut led to lower quality of hire and customer service, as well as unintended consequences in other departments from decreased customer loyalty and amount spent per visit. The resulting financial loss after a year was well into the six figures!
Recommended Read: 6 Reasons Recruiting Doesn’t Measure New Hire Failure Rates (But Should)
Your CEO expects every function to have a measurable impact on business results — and within HR, recruiting has the most impact on revenue and profit. So what kind of data should Talent Acquisition be analyzing, measuring, and sharing with the C-suite? These are the six highest impact talent acquisition data actions, in Sullivan’s view:
- Hiring innovators
- Prioritizing jobs and hiring top talent into revenue impact jobs
- Calculating the dollar impact of quality hires
- Calculating the dollar impact of hiring top diversity talent into “customer and product impact jobs”
- Calculating the cost of “excess vacancy days” for revenue and high-impact jobs
- Shifting to a metric model that is designed to influence executives
Insights and actions in these areas can measurably improve business results. They’re the kind of metrics that gain your CEO’s immediate attention, especially if they they meet these criteria:
- It impacts a strategic business goal
- It impacts at least 1% of revenue
- It includes a future trend line and the cost of a delay
- It includes benchmark comparison numbers
- It includes the root cause
- When they see it, they think “Oh my god!”
- It drives them to demand immediate action
- It highlights the recommended actions
- It includes a just-in-time alert reminder
We’ll be sharing posts on Dr. Sullivan’s presentations next week so stay tuned!